NEWMethodology v3.3 is open for public comment.Read the draft →
About Press Ratings Partners Compare Watchlist Advertise
Company · founded 2024 · Zug & New York

A ratings agency for an industry that never had one.

Onyx scores Web3 projects on a public, versioned, 100-point methodology. Ratings are earned, never sold. Removals are published with evidence. That is the whole company.

Projects rated
2,418
across 9 categories, 14 chains
Watchlist actions
23
public, evidenced, permanent
Methodology version
v3.2
every revision published & diffed
Analysts & reviewers
31
full-time · no token holdings in rated projects

Web3 has auditors, oracles, block explorers, and eleven thousand newsletters. What it never built was the boring thing: an independent party whose only product is a defensible opinion about whether a project is what it claims to be. Every prior attempt collapsed into the same conflict — the rated party paid for the rating, and the rating drifted toward whatever the invoice suggested.

Onyx exists to hold that line. We publish the methodology before we publish the score. We publish the removal with the same prominence as the award. When we get one wrong — and we have — we publish that too. A rating you can't lose is a logo, not a rating.

We make money, and we say exactly how. Projects pay a flat review fee that buys a place in the queue, not a number. Service providers pay for marketplace listings that are labeled as listings. Sponsors buy clearly-marked placements that share no shape language with earned credentials. None of it touches a score.

How we operate

Six rules we don't negotiate.

These are structural, not aspirational — each one is enforced by how the product is built, and each has been tested by a real incident since 2024.

01

Earned is never paid.

Credibility badges, promotional placements, and warnings use three separate visual languages. No fee, size of client, or legal letter converts one into another.

02

The methodology is public and versioned.

Every criterion, point value, and revision is published with a diff. If we change how we score, you can see what changed, when, and why.

03

Removals get the same prominence as awards.

The Watchlist is primary navigation, not a footer link. Every downgrade and removal is a public case with evidence, the project's response, and a named reviewer.

04

Analysts hold no positions in rated projects.

Every analyst's disclosed wallets are screened continuously against the coverage list. Violations end employment. There have been two. Both are public.

05

No Onyx token. Ever.

A ratings agency with a token has a price feed for its own integrity. We charge fees in fiat and stablecoins, and our balance sheet holds no assets we rate.

06

Anyone can read everything.

Ratings, methodology, watchlist cases, and editorial are public without a login or a wallet. A wallet is required only to write — reviews, applications, account.

Independence

How we make money, precisely.

Independence claims are cheap. Revenue disclosure isn't. This is FY2025 actuals, audited, updated annually in March.

Revenue mix · FY2025

Review & monitoring fees
Flat fee per review cycle. Buys queue position, not outcome. Non-refundable on a low score.
46%
Marketplace listings
Vetted providers pay for listing & leads. Vetting precedes payment and is re-run annually.
27%
Data & API subscriptions
Institutional access to ratings history, watchlist feed, and methodology data.
18%
Labeled sponsorships
Flat-pill "Sponsored" placements. Capped at 10% of revenue by board policy.
9%

What is never for sale

  • A score, a tier, or a faster path to either. The queue is the queue.
  • Removal from the Watchlist, or softening of a case's language.
  • Advance notice of a downgrade. Projects and the public read it at the same block.
  • Editorial coverage, positive or the withdrawal of negative.
  • The hex seal. Credibility marks are rendered by us, on our pages, from live data — never shipped as a static asset to the rated party.
Team

The people signing the ratings.

Every published score carries a named lead reviewer. These are the people whose names go on the work.

Elena Vasquez
Chief Executive · Co-founder
Former MD, Moody's structured finance. Left in 2023 convinced the next ratings failure would be on-chain and that nobody was building for it.
elena.onyxdesk.eth
Dr. Kwame Osei
Chief Ratings Officer · Co-founder
Author of the Onyx methodology, v1.0 through v3.2. Previously led protocol risk at Gauntlet. Final signature on every tier change.
kwame.onyxdesk.eth
Marisol Chen
Lead reviewer · DeFi
Former senior counsel, SEC Office of the Chief Accountant. Writes long-form on DeFi credit, governance, and the methodology cases that surprised her.
marisol.onyxdesk.eth
Tomás Reyes
Lead reviewer · Infra & AI
Former Trail of Bits researcher. Specializes in restaking, agent provenance, and post-mortem reconstructions of audited-but-still-exploited contracts.
tomas.onyxdesk.eth
Riya Patel
Investigations · Editorial board
Former investigator, The Block. Six of her exploit reconstructions have been cited in court filings. Specialises in exit-scam forensics.
riya.onyxdesk.eth
Ingrid Halvorsen
General Counsel · Independence Officer
Former FINMA enforcement. Owns the conflict-screening program and the annual revenue disclosure. Reports to the board, not the CEO.
ingrid.onyxdesk.eth
Disclosure. All 31 analysts and reviewers disclose their wallets on hire; holdings are screened against the coverage universe every 24 hours. The two violations to date (Jan 2025, Sep 2025) resulted in termination and are documented in the annual independence report.
History

Short, and on the record.

Mar 2024
Founded
Zug, Switzerland. Methodology v1.0 published before the first rating — the order mattered.
Jun 2024
First 100 ratings
DeFi-only. Average score 61.4. Twelve applicants scored below 40 and were rejected; four disputed publicly. All four disputes are still on the site.
Nov 2024
First removal for cause
A Certified project misrepresented its multi-sig signers. Case ONX-2024-0007 established the Watchlist format still in use.
Apr 2025
Methodology v3.0
Added on-chain behavior criteria and the entity-verification requirement. 214 projects were re-scored downward; the diff was published two weeks before it took effect.
Oct 2025
Marketplace launch
Vetted providers only. The vetting bar rejected 41% of the launch cohort's applicants.
May 2026
The NovaPlay report
Our investigation into a project we ourselves had rated 81. "That is on us" — the correction ran above the fold, and the methodology gained Sec. 05.4 because of it.
22 Screen — Press onyx.xyz/press
Press & media

Covering Onyx.

Everything a newsroom needs: facts that are current, assets that are correct, and a press desk that answers. We respond to accuracy questions on any deadline; comment requests within one business day.

Press desk
Response · accuracysame day
Response · comment1 business day
SpokespersonE. Vasquez · K. Osei
PGP fingerprint4F2A 91C8 D330 7B6E
Fast facts

Numbers you can print.

Verified as of July 1, 2026. If a fact on this page conflicts with an older article, this page wins.

Projects rated
2,418
9 categories · 14 chains · methodology v3.2
Tier distribution
4.2%
of rated projects hold Certified — the top tier is meant to be rare
Watchlist cases
23
6 removals for cause · 9 downgrades · 8 under investigation
Headcount
58
31 analysts & reviewers · Zug and New York
Press kit

Assets.

One archive, or individual files. The kit never includes credibility badges — see usage rules below for why.

ZIP
Complete press kit
Logos, wordmarks, product screenshots, leadership photos, fact sheet.
24.8 MB · updated Jul 2026
SVG
Logo & wordmark pack
Hex mark and wordmark. Dark and light lockups, clearspace guides included.
1.2 MB
PNG
Product screenshots
Homepage, project page, ratings table, watchlist. 2× retina, current release.
18.4 MB
JPG
Leadership photography
Vasquez, Osei, and lead reviewers. Print resolution, credit "Onyx".
42.1 MB
PDF
Methodology v3.2
The full scoring document — citable, versioned, with revision history.
3.6 MB · also at /methodology
Usage

Brand rules, the short version.

Most of these exist for one reason: an Onyx mark next to a project's name reads as an endorsement, and endorsements are exactly what we don't sell.

Permitted
  • Use the logo to identify Onyx in coverage, commentary, and criticism — no permission needed.
  • Quote scores and tiers with the as-of date and methodology version ("scored 94, Certified, under v3.2, as of July 2026").
  • Reproduce screenshots of public pages, including Watchlist cases.
  • Cite methodology sections by number — they're stable within a version.
Not permitted
  • Recreating the hex credibility seal, at any fidelity, in any material. It is rendered only by Onyx, from live data.
  • Placing the Onyx logo next to a project's brand in a way that implies endorsement or partnership.
  • Quoting a score without its date — scores change, and stale numbers mislead.
  • "Onyx-approved", "Onyx-backed", or any construction implying we underwrite what we rate.
In the news

Coverage & announcements.

Selected coverage
FT · Alphaville The crypto ratings agency that publishes its own mistakes Jun 2026
Bloomberg After NovaPlay, institutions are asking for an Onyx score first May 2026
The Block Inside Onyx's v3.0 re-score: 214 projects marked down overnight Apr 2025
Fortune Crypto No token, no trading desk: the deliberately boring business of Onyx Feb 2025
Rekt News We tried to buy an Onyx rating. Here's what happened. Nov 2024
Press releases
2026-06-12 Onyx publishes FY2025 revenue disclosure and independence report
2026-05-20 Methodology gains Sec. 05.4 (signer verification) following NovaPlay investigation
2026-02-03 Onyx ratings data now available via institutional API
2025-10-14 Onyx Marketplace launches with 48 vetted providers
2025-04-01 Methodology v3.0: on-chain behavior and entity verification